An ingroup advantage for confidence in emotion recognition judgments: the moderating effect of familiarity with the expressions of outgroup members.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The confidence we have in our assessment of an interaction partner's emotional state can have important consequences for the quality of the interaction. Two studies assessed the hypothesis that immigrants are more confident in their judgment of others' emotional facial expressions if the expresser is a member of their cultural ingroup rather than a member of the host community or another cultural group. In addition, the effects of the perceived familiarity with the type of expression, the length of residence in the host country, the quality of cross-cultural contact, the level of acculturation, and the intensity of the facial expressions were assessed. Overall, the results revealed an ingroup advantage effect for confidence ratings as well as support for the notion that individuals are more confident when judging expressions that they consider as more frequently displayed in everyday life. Furthermore, individuals were more confident when judging happiness expressions as well as more intense expressions in general.
منابع مشابه
Positivity bias in judging ingroup members' emotional expressions.
We investigated how group membership impacts valence judgments of ingroup and outgroup members' emotional expressions. In Experiment 1, participants, randomized into 2 novel, competitive groups, rated the valence of in- and outgroup members' facial expressions (e.g., fearful, happy, neutral) using a circumplex affect grid. Across all emotions, participants judged ingroup members' expressions as...
متن کاملAffective divergence: automatic responses to others' emotions depend on group membership.
Extant research suggests that targets' emotion expressions automatically evoke similar affect in perceivers. The authors hypothesized that the automatic impact of emotion expressions depends on group membership. In Experiments 1 and 2, an affective priming paradigm was used to measure immediate and preconscious affective responses to same-race or other-race emotion expressions. In Experiment 3,...
متن کاملIntergroup Perception and Cognition: An Integrative Framework for Understanding the Causes and Consequences of Social Categorization
The primary aim of this chapter is to provide a framework to understand and synthesize the processes of person construal—early perceptions that lead to initial ingroup/ outgroup categorizations—with the processes involved in intergroup relations. To this end, we review research examining the initial perception and categorization of ingroup and outgroup members and its downstream consequences. W...
متن کاملCulture, group membership, and face recognition. Commentary: Will you remember me? Cultural differences in own-group face recognition biases
Literature reports that same-race faces are better recognized than cross-race faces. This cross-race effect has been observed, inter alia, in European Americans (MacLin et al., 2004) as well as in Asian Americans and East Asians (Michel et al., 2006; Hayward et al., 2008). Although research showed that cross-race effects reflect a superiority in the processing of components and configurations o...
متن کاملREVERSAL OF THE BLACK SHEEP EFFECT 1 Running head: REVERSAL OF THE BLACK SHEEP EFFECT Not as black as one of 'them': Positive ingroup valence reverses the Black Sheep Effect
Judgments about individual group members are often colored by judgments about the entire group. Through such an assimilation effect, an individual norm violator from a positively evaluated group, for example an ingroup, can be expected to be evaluated less negatively than an outgroup norm violator. This hypothesis however contrasts with evidence that ingroup norm violators are often derogated c...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Personality & social psychology bulletin
دوره 32 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006